APPLICATION PROCEDURE FOR SUBSTITUTE TEACHING
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• Complete substitute application form and attach a photocopy of your valid Nova Scotia teaching license, along with original or copy of original course transcripts in support of teaching license and B.Ed. (downloaded copies from the internet will not be accepted). • Include two written references from individuals who have observed the quality of your teaching pre-service. (i.e. teacher, principal, university supervisor/advisor) • Complete Direct Deposit form (attach a void cheque). • Complete the Child Abuse Registry Search Form A (copy enclosed) and send it to the address listed on the bottom left corner. (Please note that the form must be filled out and signed with blue ink.) You will need to attach a photocopy of your driver’s license or health card. Once you receive a letter from the Dept of Community Services stating that your name does not appear on the register, we will require a copy of the letter before processing your application for substitute teaching. • Have a Criminal Records Check done by the local police department or RCMP, and return it to this office for your file. A criminal records check that is older than one year will not be accepted. Please note that you will have to pick this form up, they do not mail it to our office. We will require a copy of this completed form before processing your application for substitute teaching. • All potential substitute teachers with the Cape Breton Victoria Regional School board are required to read/view and adhere to the Conflict of Interest Policy, the Sexual Harassment Policy, and the Reporting Seriously Disruptive Behaviour Modules. The Policies can be found here
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.034 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.662 | 0.506 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".