EDITORIALS Special announcement: Guidelines to the practice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
of Anaesthesia (the Guidelines) was approved by the Council of the Canadian Anaesthetists ’ Society (the Soci-ety) on January 17, 1975 and published in booklet form in 1977. Several concurrent events drove the formulation of the Guidelines.1 The development of standards on ‘‘Anes-thesia Services’ ’ by the Canadian Council on Hospital Accreditation (now Accreditation Canada) was an initial cause of concern in anesthesia circles, since it was per-ceived as an encroachment on ‘‘areas of responsibility’’. At about the same time, there were two unfortunate deaths under anesthesia that prompted the Canadian Medical Protective Association to consult with the Society and to advise them to propose minimum standards of anesthesia practice. The Committee on Standards of Practice was directed to
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.087 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.018 | 0.021 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.045 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".