Attitudes; Teacher Education Programs; 'aching
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SP 0>i9 y976 A survey of 1 / graduates of Project T.E.A.C.H.-(Teacher Effectiveness and Classroom Handling), adinservice education program offered through the Ontario (Canada) Public School Men Tedcher's AssoCiation in conjunction with Lesley College, used closed-. and open-ended questions to obtain evaluations ofrthb. project'.s effectiveness. Five project areas were surveyed: (1) p sent use of Project T.E.A.C.H. skills and standards; (2) motives of r participation;-(3) effedf of Project T.E.A.C.H. on peer < relationships; (4) teaching level; and (5) overall assessment of the project as a teaching device. t11 respondents maintained some-knowledge of the course cdmponents, although the amount of implementation of skills learned through the project decreased over a three-year period. In spite of a,generally positive view of Project T.E.A.C.H., fewer than half of the respondents expiessed an active desire to pursue its sequel, ' Project P.R.I.D.E: A copy of th, questiorinaire and glossary of terms is appended. (PG)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".