Bibliographic record
Abstract
Capilano / Seymour Water Projects (CMAC) is to provide advice as to effects on the community in relationship to projects associated with North Shore water transmission system development, enhancement and maintenance. The CMAC will monitor and provide advice to District and Metro Vancouver staff and Council as to: 1. Design, construction and mitigation options related to the treatment / purification/distribution of water from the Capilano and Seymour reservoirs and associated facilities on the North Shore; 2. The implementation of construction monitoring and mitigation measures including traffic, parking, dust, noise, air quality and safety; 3. Schedule of construction activities, both short and long term with an emphasis on monitoring milestones and discussions of alternatives, where relevant, to minimize impacts on the community; 4. Monitoring and mitigation for other unforeseen issues that may arise that have a negative impact on the community; and 5. Communication with the community (e.g. timely information for residents regarding
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.016 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".