FIELD CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF JOKERS HILL King Township, Regional Municipality of York
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The following list is based on observations and collections by the authors between 1997 and 1999, with later additions by numerous observers. It includes all species known to be growing outside of cultivation within the Jokers Hill property. Also listed are native species found in land adjacent to the Jokers Hill property, but not yet found on the site (scientific name preceded by "* "- 13 species). A total of 631 taxa (species and hybrids) are listed; 450 taxa are considered native to Jokers Hill (those listed in bold typeface) and 181 are considered non-native (listed in regular typeface). Determining native versus non-native status required a few rather arbitrary judgements. Several people assisted in the preparation of this list. P. Ball of the University of Toronto at Mississauga and A. Reznicek of the University of Michigan assisted with a number of difficult identifications, especially in the Cyperaceae. T. Dickinson and J. Bull of the Royal Ontario Museum identified the Crataegus specimens. Warren Wagner at the United States National Herbarium identified Oenothera biennis, Oenothera parviflora, and Oenothera villosa subsp. villosa. Peter Kotanen formatted the document for the world wide web
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.063 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".