MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7099402865

ARIZONA COOPERATIVE E TENSION The American Hornet Moth in the

2014· article· en· W7099402865 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLarvaPupaHatchingBark (sound)MatingInsectConfusionNest (protein structural motif)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The American hornet moth, Sesia tibialis, is a serious pest of several species of poplars and willows in the higher elevations of northern Arizona. Aspen are a particularly favorite host. Range Widely found throughout much of southern Canada, and the northern United States including the states of the southern Rocky Mountains and California. Description Unlike the bark beetles that infest the ponderosa pine of northern Arizona, these pests are a lepidopterous insect. The insect order, Lepidoptera, are the moths and butterflies. The clear wing moths, a common name for this type of moth, are easily confused with other insects. The larvae look similar to roundheaded, wood-boring beetle larvae and the adults resemble wasps and hornets. Adults are about one inch long and are wasp-like in appearance. They are black with yellow stripes and accents, and with clear wings (fig.1). Hence the confusion with wasps and hornets. The adult emerges from an infested tree in the late spring through early summer by boring a ⁄ inch hole near the base of the tree. As the adult exits, a telltale brown paper-like pupal case will be left protruding from the tree (fig.2). After mating females deposit 200-600 eggs in the cracks and crevices of the host trees. Adults only live for four to ten days. Eggs are oval and light to medium brown. The surface of the egg has a net like appearance. At hatching the larva is ⁄ inch long. Larvae are offwhite in color, and grow to 1⁄ inches long with a black head (fig. 3). Larva have poorly developed crochets on the abdominal prolegs. When the larvae mature they form a two inch long by half inch diameter cocoon from the wood chips (fig.4). The larvae spend two years in the tree. Damage The larvae of these moths damage the tree by boring into the wood of the tree. They form extensive tunnels generally

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.249
Threshold uncertainty score0.832

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2490.045

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLepidoptera: Biology and TaxonomyFrench-language works237,207