NEW ENGLAND FISHERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL HabitatlMarine Protected Areas/Ecosystems I. STATUS Meetings:
Bibliographic record
Abstract
consider the Habitat PDT's recommendation for a Great South Channel RAPC to be included in Phase 1 of the EFH Omnibus Amendment 2. The Committee also received a presentation from the Gulf of Maine Mapping Initiative (GOMMn. The next Committee meeting has not been scheduled at this time. HabitatJMPAJEcosystem Plan Development Team: The PDT met on August 15, 2007 in Narragansett, RI to develop a recommendation to the Committee for a Great South Channel RAPC as directed by the Council at the June 2007 Council meeting. The PDT also discussed the tasks and milestones for Phase 2 of the EFH Omnibus Amendment and heard a briefing from Dr. Jeremy Collie (PDT member) on a recent habitat research cruise findings. The next PDT meeting has not been scheduled at this time. HabitatIMPAJEcosystem Advisory Panel: The Advisory Panel has not met since the last Council meeting. The next Advisory Panel meeting has not been scheduled at this time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.252 | 0.036 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".