MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7099480292

Pierre BonnechereThe Sea as a Two-Way Passage between Life and Death in Greek Mythology

2013· article· en· W7099480292 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCuriosityScholarshipMythologyGraduate studentsDisenchantmentChose
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I wish to thank all those who have helped me achieve my goals in higher education. Dr. Pierre Bonnechere and Dr. Egbert Bakker were my first mentors at the Université de Montréal, Centre d’Études Classiques. Dr. Bakker ignited my curiosity for Greek literature and encouraged my early efforts at research. His open-mindedness was and remains a model in my academic life. Dr. Bakker provided much-needed moral support and advice throughout my undergraduate and graduate studies. I am grateful for his friendly mentorship. Dr. Pierre Bonnechere, with his rigorous teaching and no less rigorous grading, helped me develop serious research methods. His scholarship and lectures inspired me to always keep learning and to pursue every thread of my research thoroughly, no matter how insignificant or fanciful some details may seem (as for instance, dolphins or aquatic birds!). I am thankful for the fascinating discoveries I have made in this way, and I deeply appreciate the generous gift of his time and attention with my research and graduate studies. At the University of Texas at Austin, Dr. Paula Perlman has been my mentor and dissertation advisor. Under her guidance I have discovered the study of epigraphy, and

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.013
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClassical Antiquity StudiesFrench-language works237,207