Working Draft- Please Do Not Quote Mexico and North American Security
Bibliographic record
Abstract
2 The profound changes Mexico has undergone over the last two decades (a significant, albeit protracted, move away from authoritarianism and into highly competitive electoral politics and the transformation of a fairly closed economy to one integrated with international markets) did not appear to have affected its foreign policy as it continued to maintain, right until the end of the last administration of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), a relatively isolationist position in international affairs.1 This changed, however, with the arrival of Vicente Fox to the presidency in 2000 as he sought to veer Mexico into a more activist international role through a foreign policy hinged on two main tracks: a close political relation with its northern neighbours and active internationalism through a more prominent role within multilateral institutions, especially the United Nations. In regard to the former, Fox articulated his vision of a new North America early in his administration. At the Quebec City Summit of the Americas of April 2001, he declared his desire to move toward a “North American Union, ” an arrangement similar to the European Union that would involve a common currency, a customs union, new political institutions, the harmonization of a wide range of policies, and the establishment of a North
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.229 | 0.078 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".