MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7099514150

OVERTREATMENT OF PROSTATE CANCER IN THE US COSTS $32

2013· article· en· W7099514150 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProstate cancerQuality of life (healthcare)Genitourinary systemRadiation therapyBlockadeProstate diseaseAndrogen suppression
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shortening the course of androgen blockade (AB) therapy from 36 months to 18 months when combined with radiation therapy (RT) does not appear to compromise outcomes in patients with high-risk prostate cancer, according to results of a randomized, multicenter, Phase III study reported at the 4th Annual Genitourinary Symposium held February 14-16, 2013 in Orlando, FL. The study found that both overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were similar in men who received 36 or 18 months of treatment. AB is associated with uncomfortable and disturbing side effects that negatively impact quality of life (QOL). These include hot flashes, decreased libido, impotence, and fatigue. The ability to treat high-risk disease with a shorter course of AB could have a major impact on QOL for these men. “A long list of side effects makes the lives of most of our patients quite miserable,” commented lead author Abdenour Nabid, MD, associate professor at Centre Hospitalier de Universitaire de Sherbrooke

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMarine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyFrench-language works237,207