MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7099514711

Author manuscript, published in "(POMA- ICA 2013), Montreal: Canada (2013)" An invariant convolution model and its Variational Bayesian Approximation approach via Students-t priors for acoustic imaging in colored noises

2013· article· en· W7099514711 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedical History and Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrior probabilityConvolution (computer science)Bayesian inferenceBayesian probabilityColoredKernel (algebra)Colors of noiseInvariant (physics)White noise
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acoustic imaging is a powerful tool to localize and reconstruct source powers using microphone array. However, it often involves the ill-posed inversions and becomes too time-consuming to obtain high spatial resolutions. In this paper, we firstly propose a shift-invariant convolution model to approximate the forward model of acoustic power propagation. The convolution kernel is derived from the Symmetric Toepliz Block Toepliz (STBT) structure of propagation matrix. Then we propose a hierarchical Bayesian inference approach via Variational Bayesian Approximation (VBA) criterion in order to achieve robust acoustic imaging in colored background noises. For super spatial resolution and wide dynamic power range, we explore the Student’s-t prior on the acoustic power distribution thanks to the sparsity and heavy tail of prior model. Colored noise distributions are also modeled by the Student’s-t prior, and this does not excessively penalize large model errors as the Gaussian white prior does. Finally proposed 2D convolution model and VBA approach are validated through simulations and real data from wind tunnel compared to classical methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical History and InnovationsFrench-language works237,207