MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7099514711

Author manuscript, published in "(POMA- ICA 2013), Montreal: Canada (2013)" An invariant convolution model and its Variational Bayesian Approximation approach via Students-t priors for acoustic imaging in colored noises

2013· article· en· W7099514711 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedical History and Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrior probabilityConvolution (computer science)Bayesian inferenceBayesian probabilityColoredKernel (algebra)Colors of noiseInvariant (physics)White noise
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acoustic imaging is a powerful tool to localize and reconstruct source powers using microphone array. However, it often involves the ill-posed inversions and becomes too time-consuming to obtain high spatial resolutions. In this paper, we firstly propose a shift-invariant convolution model to approximate the forward model of acoustic power propagation. The convolution kernel is derived from the Symmetric Toepliz Block Toepliz (STBT) structure of propagation matrix. Then we propose a hierarchical Bayesian inference approach via Variational Bayesian Approximation (VBA) criterion in order to achieve robust acoustic imaging in colored background noises. For super spatial resolution and wide dynamic power range, we explore the Student’s-t prior on the acoustic power distribution thanks to the sparsity and heavy tail of prior model. Colored noise distributions are also modeled by the Student’s-t prior, and this does not excessively penalize large model errors as the Gaussian white prior does. Finally proposed 2D convolution model and VBA approach are validated through simulations and real data from wind tunnel compared to classical methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.323
Threshold uncertainty score0.966

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3230.093

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical History and InnovationsFrench-language works237,207