ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE Development of an ototox r
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canadatenuate the ototoxic effects of aminoglycoside in animal models [1-3]. These effects shown in vivo have implications in the treatment of cochleovestibular toxicity. Corticoste-roids are also a standard treatment modality in multiple otologic conditions such as Meniere’s disease, sudden sensorineural hearing loss and hearing loss secondary to acoustic trauma. The anti-inflammatory effects of the corticosteroids which reduce the severity of the hair cell loss are thought to be paramount in their efficacy in the effect of electrode insertion trauma. In the era of ex-panded candidacy criteria where a growing percentage of patients have reasonable residual low frequency hear-ing, it is important to maximize our ability to minimize trauma to the remaining auditory hair cells and thus preserve residual hearing. One of the difficulties for the treating physician is that corticosteroid dosing regiments are still quite variable and traditionally in the role of otoprotection, they are given prior to the initiation of treatment. It is not known if there is any role for administrating systemic corticosteroids after the ototoxic drug has been given. In the field of car-
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".