Pain Medicine Consultant & Pain Specialist
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Refractory angina is a condition where the patient suffers from symptomatic objective ischaemia with Canadian Cardiovascular Society CCS functional class III or IV. Symptoms often continue despite maximum medical and interventional therapy to attempt revascularization or patients do not tolerate the standard treatments. Spinal Cord Stimulation is one of the possible treatments for this disease and is used with relative safety. Randomized controlled trials have shown efficacy for quality of life, exercise tolerance and reduced nitrate consumption. Prospective observational studies have shown long term reduction in hospital admission. Cost reduction in terms of health utilization has been demonstrated in a retrospective study (4). Postulated mechanisms of actions are reduction in pain, sympathetic tone, myocardial oxygen consumption and increased microcirculation (5). There are many challenges in the use of SCS for refractory angina in the areas of suitability, funding, surgical technique, programming and patient acceptance. In this presentation some of these challenges and the recent developments in the field of
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it