MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7099533238

SUMMARY: The Sylvia Lake Formation of the Bruce River Group is one of several

2016· article· en· W7099533238 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRecommender Systems and Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRhyoliteProterozoicFelsicVolcanic rockPyroclastic rockMaficPrecambrianAndesiteBasalt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

middle Proterozoic volcanic sequences along the northern margin of the Grenville structural province. It comprises a variety of basaltic to rhyolitic lava flows and pyroclastic rocks, of which the majority are felsic welded ash-flow tuff. The Sylvia Lake Formation is a bimodal sequence, in which low silica (basaltic) andesite and rhyolite are the predominant compositions. The rocks are nriched in potassium, and exhibit other characteristics of the high-K calcalkaline and shoshonite association. The volume of rhyolitic ash-flows in relation to the amount of mafic material, the presence of trachyandesites, and the overall chemistry are indicative of substantial influence of continental crust on the development of he volcanic pile. The volcanics are host to numerous base metal and uranium showings, and have potential for precious metal concentrations. The volcanism of the Sylvia Lake Formation represents he last expression of a long-lived middle Proterozoic plutonic episode in this area, but the tectonic framework at the time of generation of these magmas is poorly constrained. The Bruce River Group in central Labrador is one of a series of early and middle Proterozoic supracrustal sequences which outcrop along the northern margin of the Grenville structural

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRecommender Systems and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207