Approving Body: President Authority: Responsible Executive Officer: President, delegated to the Vice-President (Administration) Delegate: Comptroller Contact: Comptroller
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reason for Policy The purpose of this Policy is to: 1.1 Establish circumstances in which petty cash funds may be provided to University (a) departments and staff; Define allowable uses of petty cash funds; and (b) Establish responsibility for safeguarding petty cash funds. (c) Part II Policy Content A petty cash fund is a small amount of cash entrusted to a University of Manitoba employee. Its 2.1 purpose is to facilitate the reimbursement of small, purely incidental, non-recurring University related expenditures in a timely and efficient manner. Although it is recognized that some areas rely on petty cash to allow for efficient operation of 2.2 University business, the provision of a petty cash fund is considered a privilege. This privilege may be withdrawn at any time. Petty cash funds should never be used for: meals, entertainment, travel and business expenses. 2.3 Reimbursement of these expenses should be claimed in accordance with the Travel and Business Expense Claims Policy. The custodian of each petty cash fund is at all times responsible for the total of the fund. 2.4 Requests for new petty cash funds or replenishment of existing petty cash funds should be 2.5 requested in accordance with the Petty Cash Procedure. Part III Accountability The Office of Legal Counsel is responsible for advising the Vice-President (Administration) that 3.1 a formal review of this Policy is required. The Comptroller is responsible for the implementation, administration and review of this Policy. 3.2 All University Staff are responsible for complying with this Policy. 3.3
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.015 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.446 | 0.539 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".