CUAJ • September-October 2013 • Volume 7(9-10Suppl4) © 2013 Canadian Urological Association
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The incidence of vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis follow-ing radical prostatectomy has fallen over the past two decades, but it remains a relatively common complication of this proce-dure. Options for management include endoscopic and surgical approaches. These options are briefly discussed in this review and a management algorithm is proposed. Radical prostatectomy (RP) may lead to several potential postsurgical complications. This brief summary provides an overview of one of the most common: vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis (VUAS). The epidemiology is briefly discussed and the options for management presented. These options are sum-marized in the algorithm in Figure 1.1 Epidemiology Although VUAS remains a common potential complication of RP, the incidence has dramatically fallen over time. A study by Wennberg et al, published in 1993, showed that the stricture rate
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.038 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".