Conflict over the Hebron Development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Discussions between the Newfoundland and Labrador government and a group of oil companies who hoped to develop the Hebron Ben-Nevis oil field, in the northwest Atlantic off Newfoundland have come to an end without reaching an agreement regarding the development of the field. This is the second time plans to develop the Hebron field have stopped. The first was back in 2002 when oil prices were too low to make it a financially viable project. This round’s halt resulted from the inability of the government and the oil companies to reach a mutually agreeable development plan. The Hebron oil field was first discovered in 1981 and is thought to hold approximately 700 million barrels of oil. The field is operated by Chevron, which holds 28 % ownership in the project. ExxonMobil is the majority owner with 37.9%. Other owners are Petro-Canada with 23.9 % and Norsk Hydro with 10.2%. The Hebron field consists mostly of heavy crude oil, which is more expensive to extract and sells for less than the oil from currently producing fields in the province.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".