MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7099721170

KOREA

2014· article· en· W7099721170 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClathrate hydrateMethaneChlorideSalinitySeawaterStructural basinHydrate
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the report of the presence of brines associated with massive gas hydrate deposits on Hydrate Ridge (Oregon), there have been additional observations of pore fluids highly enriched in dissolved chloride at sites of massive gas hydrate occurrence in northern Cascadia accretionary margin (Canada), the Krishna-Godavari Basin (India) and the Ulleung Basin (Korea). Dissolved chloride (up to 1440 mM in the Ulleung Basin) generally extends from near-seafloor (~1 mbsf) to depths of ~100 mbsf. Below the depth of chloride maxima, chloride values approach concentrations that are lower or equal to seawater values, with minor negative chloride anomalies superimposed on baseline that reflect discrete gas hydrate bearing horizons. The Ulleung Basin and northern Cascadia sites were all drilled on seismic acoustic chimneys, indicative of methane transport in the gas phase. None of these sites, however, show any evidence for the formation of a salinity front that can shift the thermodynamic equilibrium and sustain gas transport through the gas hydrate stability front, as postulated by current models. More likely, hydrofracturing and critical gas pressures below the GHSZ support the gas transport. The composition of gases sampled after gas hydrate dissociation from massive shallow deposits is similar to those of

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4740.250

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→