Site Vice President FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company
Bibliographic record
Abstract
members of your staff. Included in this inspection report is the inspection conducted under Inspection Procedure (IP) 92702, to review results of the independent assessment of your corrective action program. The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission’s rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel. In addition, it has been determined that Perry is in the Regulatory Response column of the Action Matrix (as outlined in our letter of May 8, 2007). In March of 2008, the NRC reviewed Perry operational performance, inspection findings, and performance indicators for the fourth quarter of 2007. Your staff updated the performance indicator for unplanned scrams and this caused the performance indicator to cross the Green to White threshold for the second quarter of 2007. Based on this review, we concluded that Perry was operating safely. Based on the results of this inspection, five NRC-identified and four self-revealed findings of very low safety significance were identified and also involved violations of NRC requirements. In addition, two NRC-identified non-cited violations of NRC requirements, without an associated
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".