MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7099787891

Local Activisms, Global Ferninisms and the BY

2016· article· en· W7099787891 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLegal Cases and Commentary
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMilitantFeminismInternationalism (politics)Liberation movementFifteenth
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L 'auteure insiste sur le besoin depromouuoir chez toutes les militantes, les impkratifj de changement qui assurent la solidarite'j?ministe et elle ajoute que seuh les flminismes qui de?entlesyst?me dans son ensem blepeuuent attiser les inte'rtts communs desfemmespour un changement, assurer une base de solidarite'pour les femmes du Canada et d'ailleurs dans le monde quelle que soit la classe ou l'ethnie et enfin des fPminismes quipeuuentjouer un r5le dans le monde exaltant et multiforme desfemmes h l'echelle mondiale Feminist internationalism Feminism is necessarily an internationalist politics, for the systems ofexploitation and control we resist are global. In North America we understood right from the beginning of this phase of feminist activism that "No woman is free until all women are free." ' It is now becoming increasingly clear that the liberation of any community of women requires women's liberation in all communities. To win our full freedom, and not merely ameliorate women's conditions, we will have to transform global as well as national and local structures of power. Women's struggle has a long history in all regions of the world. In the current period feminists everywhere have discovered and reclaimed largely hidden histories ofwom-en's resistance. In the West we discovered Christine de Pisan from the fifteenth century, Mary Wollstonecraft from the eighteenth, and Sojourner Truth from the nineteenth. We learned that the suffragists were a mass movement Leadership at the OF militant and visionary women, i nternati anal not a tiny group of laughable mal-contents as we'd been told; that, in level has tended Canada women were recognized f 0 CO me fro m as people in law as late as 1920 only after a long struggle. Asian the economic feminists ~ o i n t o Buddha's de-SOU ^ h where batewith I;is followe;s in the sixth African feminists point to "the key role [of women] in traditional African Society... which still prevails in many African regions (e.g. in the Akan region, in the South-East

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.024
Scholarly communication0.0110.005
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLegal Cases and Commentary→French-language works237,207→