MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7099799149

North American Journal of Fisheries Management 6:69-76, 1986 ¸ Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 1986 A Tag Suitable for Assessing Long-Term Movements of Spiny Dogfish and Preliminary Results from Use of This Tag

2015· article· en· W7099799149 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntelligence, Security, War Strategy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFish <Actinopterygii>FishingWest coastFisheries managementSpiny dogfishCaptivityRange (aeronautics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract.--A tag was developed and tested for the long-term marking of spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias). The tag is retained without corrosion and with minor skin abrasion. They have not been lost from fish held in captivity for up to 3 years. Most recoveries were in the immediate release area, but some fish were recovered 250 to 7,000 km from the release area. The greatest distance travelled (7,000 km) was by a fish tagged in June 1980 in Queen Charlotte Sound and recovered in November 1982 off the northeast coast of Japan. The recovery rate for fish tagged and released in the Strait of Georgia and standardized for catch suggested that movement of spiny dogfish throughout heir range is an important aspect of their biology. Less movement was exhibited by fish tagged in the Hecate Strait region. However, of the fish that did move, the majority were recaptured off Washington and the west coast of Vancouver Island and not in the Strait of Georgia. Spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias) have been an important commercial species off the west coast of Canada and are perceived by fishermen to be a serious predator of other commercially important species. They are a long-lived species, attaining

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIntelligence, Security, War StrategyFrench-language works237,207