The BULLETIN UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
to establish a formal facilities renewal program to address a backlog of repair and maintenance issues on the St. George campus. In a report presented to Business Board April 7, Catherine Riggall, assistant vice-president (facilities and services), estimated the value of the campus ’ deferred maintenance projects — renovation and maintenance issues that have not been addressed — at $276 million. She noted that this is not just a U of T issue; the accumulated deferred maintenance for Canadian universities sits at approximately $3.6 billion, according to a report in 2000 by the Canadian Association of University Business Officers. Riggall’s office plans to initiate discussions on setting up a facilities renewal program that would set maintenance priorities on a more consistent, centralized basis to ensure more efficient allocation of resources. The biggest underlying problem at U of T is that many of the buildings are more than 100 years old, Riggall said. “The buildings just have more problems because they’re old,” she said, stressing that the university’s first priority is to address
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.045 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".