Bibliographic record
Abstract
CMHC offers a wide variety of housing-related information. For details, call 1 800 666-2642 or visit our Web site at www.cmhc-schl.gc.ca Cette publication est aussi disponible en français sous le titre: , PF 2 This research project was (partially) funded by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation ("CMHC"). The contents, view, and editorial quality of this report are the responsibility of the author(s) and CMHC accepts no responsibility for them or any consequence arising from the reader's use of the information, materials, and techniques described herein. PREFACE Between the early 1980s and the mid-1990s, the situation facing renters in Canada changed. The demography of Canada's population changed, the economy went through boom, bust, and much restructuring, and changes in spending by governments on social programs forced some renters (not to mention homeowners) to make difficult choices. This report assembles compara-ble data on the change in condition of renter households between the early 1980s and mid 1990s. The first part of the report describes how the circumstances of Canadian renters changed over
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.909 | 0.779 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".