What is the Municipal Potential?*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to explore the question of the conditions for intergovernmental partnerships through the lens of the changing place of municipalities in the Canadian intergovernmental system. The focus therefore, in the Saskatchewan context, is on partnerships between municipalities and the Saskatchewan government within the broader framework of the federal-provincial relationship. We have traditionally thought of intergovernmental partnerships largely in terms of federal-provincial relations, and the provincial-municipal relationship was seen as one in which provincial government unilaterally shaped and controlled municipal activities. My argument is that we are entering an important transition period in which municipalities are likely to acquire more power and that, in this context, it is important to reflect on how to rethink our views on provincial-municipal relations in line with a partnership model. The perspective taken in this paper is to examine the changing role of municipalities in order to understand the municipal potential for engaging in intergovernmental partnerships. An analysis of the challenges facing municipal governments will lead to an examination of the strengths and limits of municipal governments in the Canadian system and, from this, to an evaluation of their capacity to be effective partners in public policy formulation and implementation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".