MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7099841322

b) Township of Tiny – Septage Management Municipal Class Environmental

2015· article· en· W7099841322 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLibraries and Information Services
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJurisdictionRecreationClubPublic participationRecreational useUnit (ring theory)Stakeholder
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recommendation: THAT the Public Works Committee does hereby provide direction to staff in response to the letter dated June 4, 2015 from Burnside & Associates Limited on behalf of the Township of Tiny regarding the evaluation of options for the management of septage and holding tank waste generated within the Township. 4. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) All-Terrain Vehicle (ATV) Recreation Presentation – Item was referred to Staff for further information re. By-Laws established in other municipalities and related costs, including insurance premiums – PW-February 11, 2015, PW-April 22, 2015. Recommendation: THAT the Public Works Committee does hereby receive the supplemental Staff Report pertaining to the request for seasonal road use by the Central Ontario All-Terrain Vehicle (ATV) Club for information; AND FURTHER THAT it recommends to Council to implement an ATV by-law on a trial basis, the timing of which, be subject to confirmation from the adjacent municipalities that an ATV linkage will be permitted within their jurisdiction to facilitate connection between Wasaga Beach and the existing ATV forest trails within their jurisdiction;

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.377
Threshold uncertainty score0.888

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3770.101

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLibraries and Information ServicesFrench-language works237,207