MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7099857360

A RICKETTSIAL INFECTION IN CANADIAN VOLES BY JAMES A. BAKER, PH.D., Captain, Veterinary Corps, Army of the United States

2013· article· en· W7099857360 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicYersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarantineMileWildlifeMainlandGovernment (linguistics)Agency (philosophy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early in the 19th century a quarantine station was established by the Canadian government on Crosse Isle in an effort to avert spread of any disease brought in by immigrants, and incoming vessels were required to stop there for medical inspection and removal of diseased passengers. This small island, slightly over a mile long and half a mile wide, is situated about 29 miles downstream from Quebec City in the tidal portion of the St. Lawrence River. At this point some 12 miles separate the northern and southern banks of the river. Although tremendous ice floes are formed during winters, there is never a solid bridge of ice between Grosse Isle and the mainland or neighboring islands because in this section of the St. Lawrence there are tides of 15 feet or more as well as an 8 mile current. Since a distance of at least 4 miles separates the island from the nearest shore, any communication requires the agency of man. The Canadian authorities therefore thought the water barrier provided effective quarantine for, other than birds, no definite connecting link was present although a possibility existed that wild mammals could escape to the mainland

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicYersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites researchFrench-language works237,207