Draft: March 17, 2006 Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Three Year
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A simple cosmological model with only six parameters (matter density, , baryon , Hubble Constant, H 0 , amplitude of fluctua1 Dept. of Astrophysical Sciences, Peyton Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544-1001 Visiting Scientist, Cerro-Tololo Inter-American Observatory 612 Space Sciences Building, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics, 60 St. George St, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada M5S 3H8 Dept. of Physics, Jadwin Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544-0708 Code 665, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21218-2686 Department of Astronomy, University of Texas, Austin, TX Depts. of Astrophysics and Physics, KICP and EFI, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 Hubble Fellow 11 Department of Physics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 1Z1 Dept. of Physics, Brown University, 182 Hope St., Providence, RI 02912-1843 UCLA Astronomy, PO Box 951562, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1562 15 Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (SSAI), 10210 Greenbelt Road, Suite 600 Lanham, Maryland 20706 -- 2 -- tions, # 8 , optical depth, # , and a slope for the scalar perturbation spectrum, n s ) fits not only the three year WMAP temperature and polarization data, but also small scale CMB data, light element abundances, largescale structure observations, and the supernova luminosity/distance relationship.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.336 | 0.189 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".