MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7099871001

Chapter 4 LIFE IN THE FAST FOOD CHAIN: OÙ SONT LES

2014· article· en· W7099871001 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSustainabilityContext (archaeology)Trophic levelEcosystemFood securityProduction (economics)Food processing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter reviews the decline in high trophic level or ‘table ’ fish on Canada’s Pacific coast in the context of global depletion, the potential extinction of marine species and the economic and social drivers of overfishing. Impacts on Aboriginal and other coastal communities are identified. Whole ecosystem (Ecosim) models of northern British Columbia as it was in the 1750s and present-day are used to determine the sustainable food production potential of both past and present systems under different exploitation scenarios. The food production potential of the 2000 and 1750s ecosystems was assessed under four twenty-five-year simulation scenarios. Results indicate that the 1750s system could have sustainably generated over twenty times the current annual food production in northern British Columbia’s capture fisheries, while meeting UN food security criteria including cultural appropriateness. The present-day system could sustainably produce six times the fisheries yields extracted today if the fleet was adjusted to meet UN criteria for responsible fishing, and fisheries were conducted optimally to make best use of the existing resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMarine and fisheries research→French-language works237,207→