Author manuscript, published in "Ambiances in action / Ambiances en acte(s)- International Congress on Ambiances, Montreal 2012, Montreal: Canada (2012)" Ecology and the aesthetics of heat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. The sense of heat does not even register as one of our five senses. Yet, this paper proposes that an aesthetics of heat is critical to the ecological under-‐ standing of ambiance. It begins with a recent argument that the key human ad-‐ vantage in evolution is our ability to maintain a constant temperature, or homeo-‐ stasis. Cultural markers of human civilization like fire, food, clothing and buildings are seen as further refinements of this. The sense of heat is important because it is a measure of our energetic balance with the environment. If we do not maintain this balance, getting too cold or too hot for too long, we die. Recent studies in eve-‐ ryday aesthetics have opened the door to a broader definition of aesthetics and this has allowed the introduction of a new field of study – the aesthetics of heat.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".