MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7099894228

© 2004 European Society for Medical Oncology Hodgkin’s lymphoma in Chinese migrants to British Columbia: a 25-year survey

2016· article· en· W7099894228 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncidence (geometry)LymphomaReferralCancer registryPopulationGovernment (linguistics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Compared with the West, Hodgkin’s lymphoma in Oriental countries is characterized by a lower incidence rate and a higher proportion of mixed cellularity histology. Both environmental and genetic factors may be involved. Patients and methods: The incidence and pattern of pathology of Hodgkin’s lymphoma in the migrant Chinese population (0.4 million) in British Columbia (population 3.2 million) were studied. From a computer-ized database, all Hodgkin’s lymphoma cases diagnosed in British Columbia from 1970 to 1997 were identified. Chinese descent was determined using patient surname by standard methodology and verified from the treat-ment record or by patient interview. The corresponding figures from the Chinese population in Hong Kong were used for comparison. For incidence rates, the age-specific incidence of Hodgkin’s lymphoma in Hong Kong was obtained from the government cancer registry. For comparison of histology subtypes, 200 Hodgkin’s lymphoma records from a Hong Kong regional referral center for the same time period were reviewed. Crude and age-standardized incidence rates were calculated by 5-year intervals in terms of age and calendar year, and

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score0.725

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyFrench-language works237,207