MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7099913796

ARCTIC Notes on Two Deep-Water Calanoids (Aetideopsis rostrata and Neoscolecithrix farrani) from Lancaster Sound

2015· article· en· W7099913796 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcticSound (geography)The arcticShoal
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT. Two unusual calanoid copepods were collected in deepwater samples from eastern Lancaster Sound. The hitherto unknown male ofAetideopsis rosrruru is described and the frs t record OfNeoscolecithrix farrani from the western North Atlantic is reported. Key words: Canadian Arctic, zooplankton, Calanoida, morphology, distribution RfiSUMfi. Deux especes inhabituelles de copkpodes calanoids furent recueillies au cours de 1’6chantillonnage des eaux profondes de la partie est du d6troit de Lancaster. Le specimen mgle de I’Aerideopsis rostrutu, autrefois inconnu, est d6crit et le Neoscolecithrixfurruni identifi6 pour la premiere fois dans la partie ouest de l’Atlantique du nord. Traduit par Ian Badgley, Amhatech, Inc., Sherbrooke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.626
Threshold uncertainty score0.667

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDistributed and Parallel Computing SystemsFrench-language works237,207