International Sociological Association Social Movements and Social Classes Research Committee
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The institutionalisation of collective action has become a central issue in understanding the fate of social movements. The increasing interpenetration of the spheres of government action and civil society is having a particularly significant effect on the logic and modes of action of groups coping with social issues, particularly in urban space. For many, it becomes necessary to be included within the partnerships that the modern State builds up within segments of civil society, to be able to incorporate any collective action in the defence of the living environment or the promotion of social change. Even more community networks often themselves act as the orchestrators of this institutionalisation process in relation to more marginal or less organised actors. These ambiguities are particularly evident in the case of urban social movements in Montreal that, over the last thirty years, have undergone a complex process of institutionalisation. But in the present context, the emergence of a plural society has further added to the complexity of this process. In the wake of a rapid multiethnicization of the Montreal metropolitan region, new conceptions of social issues
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".