Bibliographic record
Abstract
As the internet continues its expansion in the everyday activities of public servants, many aspects of government organizations are affected. Just as new possibilities arise, challenges come along. A close examination of the impact shows deep organizational implications. The internet forces the public service to operate in a new model: the network model. This new model, increasingly recognized as a winning social and business structure, can have a profound impact on the quality and quantity of relationships that governments increasingly need in an era of growing disenchantment about the public policy process. The new structure of governance is made of flat, flexible connections, ideally pulsating with continuous action. In government this brings a fear that the volume of connections will be difficult to sustain. Government officers worry they don’t have the tools of mass-listening required for this form of enhanced participation. Fears related to the volume of relationships to create and maintain for example stop departments from building on them and turning them into a strategic advantage. There are many ambiguities about how the network model relates to the old processes. In the government traditional structure, ideas and action are implemented from the top down. The predominantly vertical public service structure is challenged in this environment where lateral and diagonal connections are heralded. The new model creates some identity crises within the public service. This paper describes the results of a project initiated in 1996 by the Canadian federal
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".