Weed Management in Kidney Bean with Tank Mixes of S-Metolachlor, Imazethapyr
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Field studies were conducted in various locations in Ontario during 2011 to 2013 to evaluate s-metolachlor, imazethapyr and linuron applied preemergence (PRE) alone and in tankmix combi-nation for the control of troublesome weeds in kidney bean. S-metolachlor, imazethapyr, linuron, s-metolachlor + imazethapyr, s-metolachlor + linuron and s-metolachlor + imazethapyr + linuron applied PRE at rates evaluated caused 3 % or less injury in kidney bean. S-metolachlor provided 87 %-91 % control of redroot pigweed, 46 %- 55 % control of common lambsquarters, and 96 %- 97% control of green foxtail. Imazethapyr provided 93 %- 96 % control of redroot pigweed, 96 %- 99% control of lambsquarters and 86 %- 93 % control of green foxtail. Linuron provided 82 %- 98% control of lambsquarters, 82 %- 99 % control of redroot pigweed and 55 %- 85 % control of green foxtail. The tank mixes of s-metolachlor plus imazethapyr, s-metolachlor plus linuron, and s-me-tolachlor plus imazethapyr plus linuron provided 92 %- 100 % control of lambsquarters, redroot pigweed and green foxtail. Generally, kidney bean yields reflected the level of weed control. Based on these results, tank mixes of s-metolachlor plus imazethapyr, s-metolachlor plus linuron, and s-metolachlor plus imazethapyr plus linuron all provide an adequate margin of crop safety and ex-
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".