MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7099987853

TITLE: Methods to Screen for Hemoglobin S in Blood Donors Selected for Exchange Transfusions: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

2010· article· en· W7099987853 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPhytochemistry and Biological Activities
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSickle cell traitThalassemiaHemoglobinHemoglobin sSickle cell anemiaHemoglobinopathyAcute chest syndromeAnemiaExchange transfusion
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hemoglobin (Hb), a protein in red blood cells (RBC), carries oxygen from the lungs to the rest of the body. Hemoglobin S (HbS), a structural variant resulting from a mutation, causes RBCs to deform into a sickle shape whenever oxygen levels are low. Sickled RBCs stick together and block blood flow through small vessels, causing pain and reducing oxygen capacity. 1 When one sickle beta-globin gene is inherited along with a normal beta-globin gene, HbS is inherited in heterozygous form (HbAS) as sickle cell trait (SCT). The carrier condition is benign because the normal form of the gene produces 55 % of the body’s Hb. 2 When two sickle beta-globin genes are inherited, HbS is inherited in homozygous form (HbSS) as sickle cell disease (SCD). 2 HbS can also be inherited with HbC (HbSC) or beta thalassemia (HbS-beta thalassemia) to produce SCD. 1 RBCs of HbSS individuals contain 90 % HbS. 2 SCD results in sickle cell anemia and clinical complications including stroke, aseptic bone necrosis, serious infections, renal failure, neurological deficits, and delayed growth. 3 According to the 2001 Canadian census, over 3.7 million Canadians (12.5 % of the population) identified their ethnic origin as one known to be at increased risk of thalassemia or

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhytochemistry and Biological ActivitiesFrench-language works237,207