MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7100001988

4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Identification and Proof Testing of New Total Flooding Agents: Toxicity and Global Environmental Assessment

2007· article· en· W7100001988 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNuclear Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOzone depletionGlobal warmingFlooding (psychology)Global-warming potentialRisk assessmentOzone layerIdentification (biology)Hazardous waste
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

(Maximum 200 words) Under the Montreal Protocol, an international treaty, the production of the fire and explosion protection agent Halon 1301 (bromotrifluoromethane, BFC-13B1, CBrF 3 ) was phased out in the United States at the end of 1993. No environmentally acceptable halon substitute that is equivalent to the existing halons in toxicity, effectiveness, and dimensionality has been identified. The objective of the overall effort is to reassess the higher volatility chemicals in the families of phosphorus compounds (with particular attention paid to phosphorus nitrides), silicon compounds (in particular, silanes and siloxanes), fluorinated amines and ethers, and other nonhalocarbons that might be appropriate for Halon 1301 replacement applications. The toxicities, atmospheric lifetimes, ozone depletion potentials (ODP), and global warming potentials (GWP) have been assessed for compounds in these families, and the results are presented in this report. Compound procurement, combustion...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.270
Threshold uncertainty score0.905

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2700.158

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNuclear Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207