MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7100026446

ACTIVE MANAGEMENT OF CURRENCY VOLATILITY WITH EMERGING MARKET PORTFOLIOS

2005· article· en· W7100026446 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEntomological Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmerging marketsPortfolioCurrencyVolatility (finance)Exchange rateCapital marketFinancial marketPortfolio investmentForeign exchange riskLiberalization
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper shows that by investing in emerging markets that the Canadian investor is able to improve his risk-return tradeoff and realize increased returns beyond those which are available from the domestic exchange (TSX300) for two of the four portfolios that were tested. It was also shown that with respect to the two portfolios that outperformed the domestic exchange that both of these investors realized a better average return over the risk-free rate per level of risk held in the portfolio over the sample period that was tested. Over the course of the last decade, one of the most pronounced developments in the world has been the overwhelming increase in the international scope of business operations. In all regions of the world national economies have become more integrated, reflected not only in an increase in the volume of cross-border goods and services transactions but also an increase in trade in financial tools of all sorts. Advances in the communication and transportation technology industry, coupled with an increase in government tendencies to reduce regulatory barriers, has not only lowered the cost of international business but can be credited for the widespread expansion of the flows of financial assets. Capital market liberalization has led to the abolition of nearly all capital and exchange controls and as a result investment

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEntomological Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207