MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7100040312

GUEST EDITORIAL Cancer of the Ovary: There Is Reason for Optimism!

2015· article· en· W7100040312 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalignancyStage (stratigraphy)Ovarian cancerCancerEpithelial ovarian cancerDiseaseModalitiesMortality rate
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epithelial ovarian cancer continues to be the leadingcause of death from a gynaecologic malignancy in Canada and the developed world. In 2008, an estimated 2500 Canadian women were diagnosed with ovarian cancer, and approximately 1700 died from their disease, still a very sobering and unfortunate reality for the disease that often only “whispers.”1 While survival in early stage and particu-larly in low grade tumours approaches 90%, the majority of women will present with advanced FIGO stage 3 or 4 dis-ease, will have manifested only vague abdominal symptoms, and can only expect a survival rate of approximately 15 % to 40%.2 Conventional screening modalities such as the ovarian can-cer tumour marker serum CA-125 and trans-vaginal pelvic ultrasound have been disappointing, with studies demon-strating a less than optimal positive predictive value and

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.221
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207