MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7100042676

1 A Forum for Natural, Cultural and Social Studies A Forum for Natural, Cultural and Social Studies

2014· article· en· W7100042676 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAquatic and Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcticSocial studiesClimate changeThe arcticGlobal warmingCultural studies
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a growing consensus that the world is getting warmer and that, over the next century, this additional warming will have serious consequences for the global environment. As the planet warms, changes in average temperatures are expected to be greatest in the Arctic. By 2100, winters in the Canadian Arctic are projected to aver-age 5-8ºC warmer than they are now (Gov-ernment of Canada 1999), which may re-sult in a decrease in Arctic Ocean ice cover. While some northern fauna may benefit from such a change by exploiting new habi-tats, others, such as ringed seals and polar bears, may be in jeopardy because they are

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.040
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.700
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.040
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0100.005
Scholarly communication0.0230.019
Open science0.0030.023
Research integrity0.0200.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3000.110

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAquatic and Environmental StudiesFrench-language works237,207