Hospital Course and Early Clinical Outcomes of Two-incision
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty has been reported to have a better functional recovery by minimizing soft tissue trauma as compared with the conventional approach. This study analyzed the hospital course and early clinical outcomes of a series of 63 two-incision total hip arthroplasties. Methods: Sixty patients (63 hips) were enrolled between September 2003 and July 2004 and followed for two years. Preoperatively, demographic data, body mass index, and diagnosis were recorded. Hip function and quality of life were assessed using the Harris hip score and the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Results: The mean operating time, blood loss, wound length, and hospital stay were 151 minutes, 700 ml, 9.9 cm, and 5 days, respectively. The mean cup abduc-tion angles were 42.9 ° and the mean cup anteversion angles were 17.9°. Transient lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injuries occurred in 15.9 % of cases. Intraoperative femoral fracture occurred in 2 cases and superficial wound infection occurred in 1 case. Despite these incidents, overall results
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".