MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7100048918

ARCTIC Digestibility of Plants in Ruminal Fluids of Barren-Ground Caribou

2015· article· en· W7100048918 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMosquito-borne diseases and control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLichenArcticCarexFermentationDigestion (alchemy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT. The comparative digestibilities of plants and their rates of digestion in vitro were assessed by fermentation with ruminal fluids obtained from barren-ground caribou (Rungifer rurundus groenlundicus) shot on their winter range in the southern Northwest Territories. There was a near-linear increase in the in vitro, dry-matter disappearance (IVDMD) with fermentation time (30-120 h) for all eight lichen species that we tested. In contrast, IVDMD was essentially maximal after 60 h fermentation for 10 of 11 non-lichen species. The green leaves of Carex rosrruru and Equisetum vuriegurum were the only species with IVDMDs higher than 50 % after a 60-63 h fermentation period. The two species of mosses and a liverwort were poorly digested (15-27%). The addition of 63 mg of urea to each tube markedly increased the digestibilities of both species of lichens tested, and that of Vuccinium vitis-idueu, but it lowered the IVDMD of Salix and Betula stems and the green and cured parts of Carex rosrruru. The IVDMDs of four lichen species collected on the Canadian Arctic Islands were higher than those of eight terricolous species obtained from the mainland winter range of R.r. groenlundicus. Key words: Rungifer, caribou, in vitro, digestibility, forages, lichens, rates, Canada RfiSUME. La digestibilitt comparative de plantes et leur taux de digestion in vitro ont t t t Bvaluks par la fermentation de fluides ruminaux obtenus de caribous des landes (Rungifer rurundus groenlundicus) tirts dans leur habitat hivernal dans le sud des Territoires du Nord-Ouest. I1 y a eu une augmentation quasi-lintaire de la disparition in vitro de matibre sbche (DIVMS) avec un ptriode de fermentation (30-120 h) pour les huit especes de lichens mises B I’tpreuve. Par opposition 8 ceci, la DIVMS Btait essentiellement maximale aprbs une fermentation de 60 h dans 10 des 11 espbces de non-lichens. Les feuilles vertes du Curex rosrraru et de 1’Equiseturn vuriegutum ttaient les seules espbces

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMosquito-borne diseases and control→French-language works237,207→