MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7100095205

hoary willow Status: State Threatened

2012· article· en· W7100095205 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBioenergy crop production and management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWillowDeciduousThreatened speciesShrubSalicaceaeWhite (mutation)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

General Description: Shrub 1 to 5 feet ( to 1 m) tall; twigs white woolly when young with deciduous yellow scales; leaves narrow, slender, thick and firm to the touch, densely white woolly beneath and dark green above, with margins rolled under; winter buds with a nonresinous scale; male flowers with two hairless stamens, anthers purple; female flowers with reddish colored minute sub-sessile stigmas; capsules unusually short, usually bearing short hairs; fruits white-woolly. Identification Tips: The twigs and lower leaf surfaces of S. candida are covered with long, slender, dense, matted, tangled, woolly appressed hairs. S. candida seldom grows over 1 m tall and it has leaves that are 3 to 10 times as long as wide. Other closely related species of Salix have slightly to variously hairy twigs and leaves, their leaves are often more or less sericeous or spreading-hairy beneath, but not in the manner of Salix candida, and their leaves and growth forms are various. Phenology: Flowering occurs in May as leaves emerge or just before they emerge. Range: Alaska to Labrador, south to southern British Columbia and in the Rocky Mountain Ranges of Idaho, Colorado, and Washington,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.202
Threshold uncertainty score0.675

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2020.037

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBioenergy crop production and managementFrench-language works237,207