The Biology of Svastra obliqua obliqua (Say) with a Taxonomic Description of its Larvae
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the past 10 years a considerable amount of information regard-ing the biology and the larvae of the non-parasitic members of the An-thophoridae has been published. Many of the papers have been especially concerned with the interrelationships of the various subfamilies and the relationship of the parasitic anthophorids with the non-parasitic ones. It is obvious, however, that we must still learn much more about the biology and larvae of the members of the family before more than tentative con-clusions can be drawn. The present paper treats the biology and first- and last-stage larvae of Svastra (Epimelissodes) obliqua obliqua (Say) (Eucerinae) with the hope that these data will eventually prove valuable in elucidating the phylogeny of the family. One of the most widely distributed and abundant species of the genus, Svastra obliqua, ranges through the United States and parts of Mexico and Canada and is divisible into three subspecies. All available biological in-formation refers to the nominate form. Custer (1928, 1929) has provided considerable information on the nesting habits and cocoon construction of this species, and LaBerge (1956), after reviewing Custer's 1928 paper, has discussed flower preference. Nothing is known about the biology of any other member of Svastra.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".