CASE REPORT Surface Anatomy of the Ear
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Expert diagnosis of cutaneous pathology requires precise anatomic description. This brief report will review the clinically relevant surface anatomy of the ear. Bien connaı̂tre l’anatomie de l’oreille a des incidences sur le plan clinique en ce qui concerne l’évolution des cancers de la peau siégeant en des points particuliers et la complexite ́ de la reconstruction chirurgicale. Le cas présente ́ ici et l’examen de l’anatomie de la surface de l’oreille aideront les cliniciens a ̀ repérer ces points particuliers. N ONMELANOMA SKIN CANCER (NMSC) is themost common type of human cancer.1,2 It accounts for over 1 million new cases in the United States every year3,4 and over 80,000 new cases in Canada, more than cancers of the lung, colorectum, and breast combined.2 Although NMSC generally carries an excellent prognosis, with a very low mortality rate,5 several factors have important prognostic implications. These include the tumor size and type, immune status of the patient, and anatomic location of the lesion. Each of these can increase the burden of disease and necessitate more complicated
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".