MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7100220259

IESO Stakeholder Advisory Committee Minutes of Meeting

2012· article· en· W7100220259 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Power System Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStakeholderAdvisory committeePlan (archaeology)LegislatureRepresentation (politics)Stakeholder engagement
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mr. Witjes welcomed everyone to the meeting, in person and joining via teleconference. He acknowledged representation from the Board of Directors and thanked them for their participation. Mr. Witjes noted that Craig Martin had relocated to Boston and has resigned from the Stakeholder Advisory Committee (the “Committee”). On behalf of the Committee, Mr. Witjes thanked Mr. Martin for his participation and contribution during his term representing the Generator sector. November 22, 2012 Public Page 1 of 13Mr. Witjes advised attendees that summary notes were posted on the IESO website of the previous meeting of the Committee, which was held to discuss plans for the proposed merger of the IESO with the Ontario Power Authority (OPA) under Bill 75. He invited questions, comments, and agenda items from observers at the appropriate times. There were no additions to the agenda. Agenda Item No. 2: IESO Senior Management Update – Bruce Campbell Mr. Campbell took the floor to provide an update to the Committee on several items. a) Renewable Integration Initiative (SE-91)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.024
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.583

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0240.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0070.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1740.084

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Power System OptimizationFrench-language works237,207