MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7100247297

Development of a multilocus sequence typing scheme for intestinal spirochaetes within the genus

2007· article· en· W7100247297 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary medicine and infectious diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpirochaeteMultilocus sequence typingPhylogenetic treeLocus (genetics)TypingPopulationGenotypingAllele
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a multilocus sequence typing (MLST) scheme for intestinal spirochaetes of the genus Brachyspira. Eight loci mainly coding for enzymes previously used in multilocus enzyme electrophoresis analysis of Brachyspira species were examined in 66 Brachyspira field isolates and type/reference strains. The isolates and strains were recovered from pigs, birds, dogs and a mouse and originated from seven European countries, the USA and Canada. Forty-six isolates represented recognized Brachyspira species and 20 represented provisionally designated species or isolates that have not been classified. Only two loci gave PCR products for all 66 strains and isolates, but amplicons for seven loci were obtained for 44 of the isolates. Sequences for each locus had a DNA allelic variation of 30–47 and an amino acid allelic variation of 14–47 that gave rise to the same number of sequence and amino acid types (58) for the strains and isolates studied. A population snapshot based on sequence and amino acid types showed a close phylogenetic relationship amongst the porcine isolates from the same geographical regions, and indicated a close evolutionary relationship between isolates recovered from pigs and mallards. A general concordance was obtained between the MLST groupings

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.338
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.147
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVeterinary medicine and infectious diseasesFrench-language works237,207