© 2007 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors D O I: Commentary
Bibliographic record
Abstract
All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association. Acupuncture is entering the legislative mainstream ofCanadian health care. The province of Ontario isabout to legislate acupuncture as a therapeutic act un-der the jurisdiction of the Colleges responsible for the practi-tioner administering treatment (e.g., the College of Physi-cians and Surgeons of Ontario for physicians and the College of Nurses of Ontario for nurses). University courses in acupuncture are offered at both the University of Calgary and McMaster University. Colleges of traditional Chinese medi-cine exist in both British Columbia and Alberta. Traditional Chinese medicine is particularly noted for its focus on the maintenance of health, well-being and disease prevention. Acupuncture is extensively used in the treatment of chronic pain and in rehabilitation from musculoskeletal injuries. The moments when Western and traditional Chinese medicine in-tersect can be very interesting. The perioperative period may
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.038 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.032 | 0.015 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.088 | 0.040 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".