MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7100303699

The Ecology of Atlantic Cod (Gadus morhua) in Canadian Arctic Lakes

2010· article· en· W7100303699 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcticAbiotic componentHabitatPredationCannibalismAtlantic cod
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT. The range of limnological conditions that support Atlantic cod populations in meromictic Arctic lakes is known to be relatively restricted. The degree to which differences in these features, particularly in the availability of allochthonous and autochthonous prey, affect the condition and growth of cod in these populations is unknown. We compared measures of condition among three Atlantic cod populations on Baffin Island, Nunavut, to assess their relationship to differences in potentially important habitat parameters. We also compared data spanning two decades (Ogac Lake) to five decades (Qasigi-aliminiq) to assess the degree to which natural and anthropogenic factors may have affected these populations. In general, growth rate and asymptotic length tend to be high under situations of intense cannibalism and when alternative prey species are relatively abundant. Biotic and abiotic habitat features in Ogac Lake appear to have been relatively stable since the 1950s, although the abundance of sea urchins appears to have decreased, which may explain the observation that the incidence of cannibalism has doubled. The mean size of angled cod in Qasigialiminiq has decreased by about 10 cm over the past 20 years. Key words: landlocked Atlantic cod, cannibalism, Arctic, meromictic lakes, growth comparisons, condition factor comparisons, diet comparisons RÉSUMÉ. L’étendue des conditions limnologiques qui soutiennent les populations de morue franche dans les lacs méromic-tiques de l’Arctique est reconnue pour être relativement restreinte. La mesure dans laquelle les différences caractérisant ces conditions a une incidence sur l’état et la croissance des morues n’est pas connue, particulièrement en ce qui a trait à la disponi-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score0.280

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→