MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7100323730

UC SANTA CRUZ DISSERTATION AND THESIS PREPARATION GUIDELINES

2012· article· en· W7100323730 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAcademic Writing and Publishing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Consistency (knowledge bases)PublicationGraduate studentsPublishingDoctoral dissertationGraduation (instrument)Graduate degreeStatement (logic)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The submission of the Doctoral dissertation or Master’s thesis is the final step in the program leading to the award of your degree. The manuscript is a scholarly statement of the results of a substantial period of research and preparation. It will be made available for public use in McHenry Library, and published by UMI Dissertation Publishing / ProQuest Information and Learning. For these reasons, the Graduate Council has established guidelines for uniformity in the physical format of the manuscript. The concern of the Graduate Council in establishing these guidelines is to obtain a permanent and readily reproducible form of presentation, and consistency in the arrangement of the contents. The dissertation or thesis must be a professionally finished work in format, style, spelling and appearance. Deadline: All candidates for a degree must submit an Application for Doctor of Philosophy degree or Application for Master’s Degree to Graduate Studies by the date stated in the Academic and Administrative Calendar for the quarter you wish to receive the degree. Registration Requirement: A student is required to be registered or on filing fee status, whichever is applicable, during the quarter in which the degree is conferred. Students should consult Graduate Studies or the department to determine which option fits their situation. A. Number of copies PREPARATION OF FINAL COPIES One approved pdf copy should be submitted through the ProQuest/UMI dissertation site by the date stated on the Academic Calendar. Consult your graduate adviser to determine the number of additional copies required by the faculty committee. Please note that your department may require a separate electronic or paper copy. B. Fonts Embedded fonts REQUIRED. Post Script Type 1 fonts required. Any legible font except script, italic or ornamental fonts, equivalent in scale to 10pt. Arial or 12pt. Times New Roman accepted. However, fonts should not be mixed inappropriately. Italicized font may be used for non-English words and quotations. Applies to all text including captions, footnotes/endnotes, citations, etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.049
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.493
Threshold uncertainty score0.723

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.049
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0140.004
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4930.539

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAcademic Writing and PublishingFrench-language works237,207