Director of Environmental Health and Safety Director of Environmental Health and Safety
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1.1 To set out Procedures secondary to Policy: Health and Safety, in conjunction with the need to manage asbestos containing materials where approximately 70 % of the buildings at the University have some form of asbestos containing materials in their construction. Asbestos is a recognized cancer-causing material and there are regulatory requirements that apply to prevent uncontrolled exposure to workers and the public when the material is disturbed. The University has developed a comprehensive and documented Asbestos Management Program (AMP), to ensure a safe workplace is maintained for all employees, students and the visiting public. Part II Procedural Content 2.1 The AMP provides information, procedures and work practices relevant to management and control of asbestos-containing building materials known to be present throughout various buildings, which fall under the control, occupancy or administration of the University. It has been developed in part, to fulfill the University's obligations under Manitoba Regulation 53/88 and to provide the means from which future exposures to asbestos may be prevented. 2.2 All construction, maintenance, repair and renovation of University premises shall be conducted in accordance with the latest edition of the AMP and associated Appendices as published by the Environmental Health and Safety Office. 2.3 The AMP shall be maintained by the Environmental Health and Safety Office, in consultation with Physical Plant and the University Workplace Health and Safety Advisory Committees. Updates to the AMP shall be made on a regular and required basis, in consultation with the Asbestos Management Program Committee. This committee shall have representation from the various bargaining units on campus. 2.4 The AMP shall: (a) (b)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.347 | 0.158 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".